Barnet were due to hold a Financial Performance and Contracts Committee meeting last week but postponed it until the end of January due to election "purdah". I did write to Cllr Zinkin asking him to reconsider this decision given that there was nothing that would appear to breach purdah rules in the planned agenda and it is essential that Cllrs should keep a tight control over finances. He said that they wouldn't reconsider the meeting but that they would try to publish key financial information. This week he kept to his word and published what appear to be some of the reports that would have been considered.
However, what the key report shows is that at Month 7 (October) the Council was still forecasting an overspend this financial year by £6 million before drawdown from reserves. There are a number of reasons for this overspend. One of them is caused by the closure of the Finchley Lido while repairs to its unsafe roof are on-going, losing £736,000 of revenue. Here are a couple of pictures of the repair work courtesy of the GLL website.
The big worry is how much more is this going to cost to repair, while all the time it is losing revenue by being shut. It also makes you wonder how the roof was allowed to reach such a serious condition that such major works were required and why this problem wasn't picked up sooner.
Streetscene, which includes the bin collection service, is still £1.4 million overspent which is apparently due to additional agency staff costs and the service being split between two depots. As I have said many times, the bin reorganisation has been a disaster in that it has failed to save any of budgeted savings, and hence the overspend. They also note that there is a £400,000 overspend on maintenance of the refuse vehicles. I know they have been having problems but they bought four new refuse vehicles last year when they reorganised the rounds and in the last 4 months have bought another 16 new refuse vehicles at a cost of £3.4 million so that does seem to undermine their argument.
There is an overspend of £4 million on unfunded care packages for the elderly, albeit this is partially offset by an underspend in Learning Disabilities. It runs to the heart of the problem with Central Government who continue to push all the costs for elderly care onto individuals who, when they run out of money or if they lack the funds, become the responsibility of the local authority. Barnet has an ageing population and according to Barnet's own figures, the number of residents aged over 65 will grow by 37% over the next ten years. As such the financial pressure on Barnet to meet unfunded adult care is likely to grow dramatically.
Children's and Family Services are overspent by £1.2 million of which £744,000 is down to staff overspend. After the Inadequate Rating of the service in 2017 money was thrown at the problems including bringing in some very expensive staff on agency contracts. Perhaps if the council had been less ready to cut the budget in previous years the service might not have declined to the point where it need such a large injection of funds.
What is clear is that every year Barnet set savings targets and they consistently fail to achieve them. There is always a reason but it remains a worrying trend.
Over the next five years Barnet have a forecast budget shortfall of £118.7 million according to their own figures.
The new Conservative government appear to have made very little provision to address the massive cuts local authorities are going to be forced to make in the next 5 years. There is no policy to address the problem of social care funding which will put yet more pressure on local authorities.
These are all matters that councillors should have been discussing last week, looking at how Barnet can live with these huge financial problems yet this is now postponed till the end of January and because the public are effectively gagged there will be very limited public scrutiny.
Many people seems positive about this new government - Based on the finances, I have nothing but dread for the poorest and most vulnerable in our society.
Seasons Greetings from Mr Reasonable.
Showing posts with label Financial Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial Issues. Show all posts
Monday, 23 December 2019
Monday, 2 September 2013
Hello Capita - please take £14.7m
Barnet Council's supplier payments for July have been published this morning. Amongst the payments is one on the 1st of July to Capita for "NSCSO Management Fee" of £14,739,960. Now I did know that this was taking place but I can't for the life of me understand why it has been paid. Yesterday, Capita took over the running of the NSCSO service so it appears that Capita have been paid £14.7 million for two months management fee.
Originally, my understanding was Capita were being paid this fee because the Judicial Review Appeal, at that time, was scheduled for October with a decision that might not come before the end of the year and that Capita would help to run the services in the interim. However, circumstances changed, the case was brought forward to mid July, an early judgement came out at the beginning of August upon which Richard Cornelius immediately signed a contract. What I want to understand is have we been ripped off, will this payment be returned in part of full or will it be offset against future payments? However, given the Council lost a shed load of money to 2e2 through large prepayments I would have thought they would have been a bit more cautious before handing over £14.7m in advance payment to Capita.
Every singe council tax payers should be asking their councillors very serious questions as to why such a huge advance payment was made and what precisely it was for.
Originally, my understanding was Capita were being paid this fee because the Judicial Review Appeal, at that time, was scheduled for October with a decision that might not come before the end of the year and that Capita would help to run the services in the interim. However, circumstances changed, the case was brought forward to mid July, an early judgement came out at the beginning of August upon which Richard Cornelius immediately signed a contract. What I want to understand is have we been ripped off, will this payment be returned in part of full or will it be offset against future payments? However, given the Council lost a shed load of money to 2e2 through large prepayments I would have thought they would have been a bit more cautious before handing over £14.7m in advance payment to Capita.
Every singe council tax payers should be asking their councillors very serious questions as to why such a huge advance payment was made and what precisely it was for.
Monday, 20 February 2012
Open Letter to Richard Cornelius and Nick Walkley from the Barnet Bloggers
Set out below is an open letter to The Chief Executive and Leader of Barnet Council. This matter has been brought to the attention of the Barnet Bloggers but such is the concern that issues like this may get 'buried' because of the current outsourcing process, that we have taken the step of publishing this letter on our blogs.
Dear Mr Cornelius and Mr Walkley,
We would like to draw to your attention the following information, and ask you to respond to some questions on a matter that we consider to be of serious public concern.
We have reason to believe that a Private Company registered as FINANCE MATTERS FOR SCHOOLS LIMITED http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07814930
may have been formed with the intention of securing contracts with schools that currently purchase financial services from the Council.
We understand that all three Directors may be current employees of the Council.
First can you confirm that all three of these Directors are indeed Council employees?
If not then the rest of our questions are not applicable.
If this is indeed the case, we would like to ask the following questions:
- Are these individuals currently employed by the authority?
- If one or more of these Directors are Council employees, can you confirm that it is not a breach of any regulations for employees to set up a private company whilst still being paid by the Council that will deal directly with services directly associated with their current employment?
- Furthermore please confirm that they may continue to have access to confidential data, and that this would not secure unfair advantage over any other possible bidders for these services?
- Do you know how many Barnet schools have given notice that they are terminating their contracts with Barnet Council Financial Services?
- When did they give notice of termination?
- What reason did they give for termination?
- How many schools have signed contracts with FINANCE MATTERS FOR SCHOOLS LIMITED?
- Were any senior managers including the section 151 officer aware of this company
- Have there been public and private discussions amongst senior managers on the creation of this new company within the Council?
We understand that Financial Services to schools are included in the NSCSO One Barnet bundle of services.
It would seem extraordinary, therefore, to us as residents, that council staff could allegedly be openly touting for business during the Competitive Dialogue process, and we would ask you to confirm that an urgent investigation should take place, and that you can assure us that all four bidders will be informed that such an investigation is in progress.
Yours sincerely,
Derek Dishman
John Dix
Vicki Morris
Theresa Musgrove
Roger Tichborne
Dear Mr Cornelius and Mr Walkley,
We would like to draw to your attention the following information, and ask you to respond to some questions on a matter that we consider to be of serious public concern.
We have reason to believe that a Private Company registered as FINANCE MATTERS FOR SCHOOLS LIMITED http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07814930
may have been formed with the intention of securing contracts with schools that currently purchase financial services from the Council.
We understand that all three Directors may be current employees of the Council.
First can you confirm that all three of these Directors are indeed Council employees?
If not then the rest of our questions are not applicable.
If this is indeed the case, we would like to ask the following questions:
- Are these individuals currently employed by the authority?
- If one or more of these Directors are Council employees, can you confirm that it is not a breach of any regulations for employees to set up a private company whilst still being paid by the Council that will deal directly with services directly associated with their current employment?
- Furthermore please confirm that they may continue to have access to confidential data, and that this would not secure unfair advantage over any other possible bidders for these services?
- Do you know how many Barnet schools have given notice that they are terminating their contracts with Barnet Council Financial Services?
- When did they give notice of termination?
- What reason did they give for termination?
- How many schools have signed contracts with FINANCE MATTERS FOR SCHOOLS LIMITED?
- Were any senior managers including the section 151 officer aware of this company
- Have there been public and private discussions amongst senior managers on the creation of this new company within the Council?
We understand that Financial Services to schools are included in the NSCSO One Barnet bundle of services.
It would seem extraordinary, therefore, to us as residents, that council staff could allegedly be openly touting for business during the Competitive Dialogue process, and we would ask you to confirm that an urgent investigation should take place, and that you can assure us that all four bidders will be informed that such an investigation is in progress.
Yours sincerely,
Derek Dishman
John Dix
Vicki Morris
Theresa Musgrove
Roger Tichborne
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




